RE: What are Laws of Nature?
March 21, 2022 at 4:42 pm
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2022 at 4:58 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(March 21, 2022 at 4:26 pm)Helios Wrote:(March 21, 2022 at 4:05 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Those in the know correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that researchers always have the option of publishing anonymously, at least in the referee phase.They often do but that sort only points out the problem. After all, why would you need to do that if there wasn't a bias? Plus I wasn't just talking about publication. The research itself in these fields have been highly male-centric
For instance medical trials
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle...cal-trials
https://theconversation.com/gender-bias-...isk-156495
the key is, of course, highly male centric research produces a body of research results that is not as widely applicable as possible, but in areas where they are applicable, they remain just as valid.
more importantly, in areas neglected by male centered research, faith based alternatives does not budge from its total bullshit status as a result.
Finally the nature of scientific research is any biased susceptible to being discovered, its effects quantified and gaps made up in ways no “alternative” to truth finding deigns to do or have even the most infinitesimal capability to do.
