What are Laws of Nature?

[polymath257]

Well, members speak for themselves - but as for this question - it's already been spoken to.  Post#17

Here's a fun q.  How would an existentialist go about making the case that their appraisal of a person was objective and consequential as to how we might define that person even in contradiction to that persons own self apprehension and...fwiw, written words?  As I mentioned, there are alot of people who would like to accept existentialist premises, like to object to objectivism in many contexts - but might still also like to make objective claims in others.  This one is as good as any for a suggestion.

---

@polymath257

Since everything is just so much easier to do directly.  Do you think that science is a god's eye view of anything?

I don't even know what that would mean in context.

Science is a human endeavor. It is a structured way to get information by proposing and testing ideas via observation.

I don't even see science as a worldview: it is a method of obtaining reliable information.