(April 18, 2022 at 7:29 pm)brewer Wrote:That's far more polite then what i would call him(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:
U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.
Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.
You're very yeasty, and yet un-risen.
I'll call you Hoastie.
![[Image: 61pW7jPEUaL._SL1500_.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61pW7jPEUaL._SL1500_.jpg)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
