Belief without Verification or Certainty

[Jehanne]

Cogito was always pregnant and fundamentally incomplete. I think, therefore I am...but what am I?

If the question of what we are rejects some content in the set of I - then thinking does not, in fact, prove that I am. If we grind it all the way down - eliminative materialist style. I am, in fact, not. There is a story about an I am, but even that story, false in point of fact on multiple fronts all by itself... is being produced by something that is not the alleged I in question.

I just don't get the claim about atheists being arrogant and/or dogmatic.