RE: Credible/Honest Apologetics?
July 14, 2022 at 6:48 am
(This post was last modified: July 14, 2022 at 6:49 am by Jehanne.)
Belacqua,
It is not very often that I encounter (at least on this board) such incredibly weak and fallacious reasoning.
When atheists "say there is no evidence for God", well, there is no evidence for IPUs, the FSM, the ISM ("Invisible Sock Monster"), etc.
As for falsifiable claims being superior to nonfalsifiable claims, the latter constitute an infinite set; why value one claim in the latter set over another? Problem with theology is that there is nothing that is "not true".
As for revelation being true, establishing such is falling off a log. I will flip a coin 100 times next Tuesday. You give me the exact sequence of heads/tails that I will get and that will prove Revelation.
As with the spontaneous healing of an adult amputee, there are events that Science cannot explain, except, that such events have yet to occur.
We continue to wait...
It is not very often that I encounter (at least on this board) such incredibly weak and fallacious reasoning.
When atheists "say there is no evidence for God", well, there is no evidence for IPUs, the FSM, the ISM ("Invisible Sock Monster"), etc.
As for falsifiable claims being superior to nonfalsifiable claims, the latter constitute an infinite set; why value one claim in the latter set over another? Problem with theology is that there is nothing that is "not true".
As for revelation being true, establishing such is falling off a log. I will flip a coin 100 times next Tuesday. You give me the exact sequence of heads/tails that I will get and that will prove Revelation.
As with the spontaneous healing of an adult amputee, there are events that Science cannot explain, except, that such events have yet to occur.
We continue to wait...
