Moral justification for the execution of criminals of war?

[bennyboy]

No, it isn't, since one is a position, and the other is a circumstance.  I think you know that I have a very dim view of law enforcement and justice here in the good ole us of a.  It's not really an issue of savagery to me - you could make the killings as genteel as you like, and we do.  It's just that I think that not killing each other is one of the best ideas society ever had.  I don't think you even have a society outside of some kind of agreement not to kill each other.  

I don't think "agreement not to kill each other" need apply when one party clearly hasn't gotten the memo. It's pretty simple-- you deprive a kid of life, you lose yours. Of course, because we're so "genteel," we will extend to these POS luxuries their victims don't get, like a trial.

Look at this:


Read this:
https://kfor.com/news/local/court-docume...nid-hotel/

In my opinion, sheltering someone that evil is itself an evil, and shows a weakness of character rather than strength of one.