Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 11, 2024, 5:56 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Moral justification for the execution of criminals of war?
RE: Moral justification for the execution of criminals of war?
(August 15, 2022 at 7:25 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:
(August 15, 2022 at 6:24 pm)bennyboy Wrote: "You. . . shouldn't. . . kill (people)," you mean.  Again, we've established that you not only kill animals, but relish the act of doing it for fun.  So harm and suffering in and of themselves are not the objection-- there's something special about people, ALL people, even the greatest pedophiliac murderer, that is sacrosanct to you.  Why would that be?  I'm saying that human life is NOT intrinsically valuable, and that to claim it is is either an emotional opiinion or a religious one-- in either case, irrational.  All the talk about morality of execution-as-murder takes human exceptionalism as axiomatic-- but I do not accept that axiom.
If a society organizes itself around the normative belief that we shouldn't kill people, which isn't human exceptionalism..just a normative declaration....it would be a breach of that normative declaration to kill people.  A society need not believe in or posit human exceptionalism to reject killing people, even killers. 

I wonder, though....do you think that a society formed around the belief that we shouldn't kill people and animals, a more inclusive taboo, would be more or less conducive to capital punishment than one that did believe in human exceptionalism?

You think that people should never be killed, but that animals may be killed for the fun of it. A killing is a killing, harm is harm, pain is pain. So yes, it's pretty apparent that if even very bad people cannot be killed, there's a blanket over the one species that is based on membership rather than on merit-- clearly, exceptionalism.

The problem is that "normative beliefs" can include things like "Niggers is savages and ain't Christian, and as their souls (if they even have souls) is anyway condemned by the Lord, the white man may do with them as he wishes."  You can have enforced compliance for those beliefs, too, based on the sincere belief of the population that what they WANT is really good, filled in with "rational" arguments once the rule is already agreed upon. Preachers, politicians, children and housewives will parrot each other in an idea so common that it is "known" to be true.

Spackle works wonders.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Moral justification for the execution of criminals of war? - by bennyboy - August 15, 2022 at 8:11 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Maximizing Moral Virtue h311inac311 191 20230 December 17, 2022 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Objectivist
  As a nonreligious person, where do you get your moral guidance? Gentle_Idiot 79 9322 November 26, 2022 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  On theism, why do humans have moral duties even if there are objective moral values? Pnerd 37 4614 May 24, 2022 at 11:49 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Can we trust our Moral Intuitions? vulcanlogician 72 7257 November 7, 2021 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Alan V
  Any Moral Relativists in the House? vulcanlogician 72 7317 June 21, 2021 at 9:09 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  [Serious] Moral Obligations toward Possible Worlds Neo-Scholastic 93 8276 May 23, 2021 at 1:43 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Moral Reality Acrobat 29 4333 September 12, 2019 at 8:09 pm
Last Post: brewer
  In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order Acrobat 84 9693 August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Moral Oughts Acrobat 109 11737 August 30, 2019 at 4:24 am
Last Post: Acrobat
  Is Moral Nihilism a Morality? vulcanlogician 140 15455 July 17, 2019 at 11:50 am
Last Post: DLJ



Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)