(September 16, 2022 at 9:48 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Also, apparently, these migrants were told they’d be given jobs and immigration papers if they went on the planes. This looks like a fairly textbook example of human trafficking, except that, from what I’ve been able to find, human trafficking seems to require some sort of benefit for the trafficker, like forced labor or sex exploitation. This case, it seems they’re looking for nothing but lulz at the prospect of Democratic leaders calling bullshit on their antics. It’d be like the Pleasure Island coachman from Pinocchio convincing all those boys to go to Pleasure Island and then, instead of bringing them there, turning them into donkeys and selling them, just dropping them off in the middle of nowhere to prove some bullshit point.But being against that is NIMBY apperently
![Dodgy Dodgy](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM