(December 2, 2011 at 9:12 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Again, your point is irrelevant, “good” is just a term to describe God’s actions, we could have described them in some other language.
So you define "good" as "what God wills" and that's how you know God is good because God wills what God wills and we know that what God wills is good because God is good and God can't be capable of doing something that isn't good because God is good and so we know...
Take a drink.
Quote:Yet, they all use the same Bible, sounds like a problem with the thousands of different people, not the Bible itself.
No True Scotsman
Take a drink.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
