(December 14, 2022 at 11:10 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote:(December 13, 2022 at 11:39 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: Yet again, no source is given for the claim that plant agriculture is responsible for most antibiotic resistance in humans, in spite of accounting for only around 0.5% of antibiotic use.
Gave up on that whole "unintentionally" thing, eh? Clown.
You do whatever makes you feel better about being an idiot, lol.
In all seriousness, though, this is like playing chess with a pigeon. You are making extraordinary statements with no references to back them up. You are not convincing, you are shocking as to how somebody might actually believe the things you say.
You are saying there is "no evidence" that the massive use of antibiotics in the egg industry (doesn't matter if it is 50% or 70% or 90% of all antibiotics) gives birth to superbacteria. What kind of evidence are you looking for? Isn't that basic biology?
You are saying that 0.5% of all antibiotics that are given to plants are responsible for most antibiotic resistance in humans. Is there any remotely-reliable source that is making that statement? You are saying that USDA says something about that (I do not know what exactly is that you are claiming they say), but you do not link to where it actually says that.
The way you are arguing, you can argue for any position that way. A wall of text is not a reference.
