Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 1, 2024, 3:35 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
#10
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
Well....as Bart Ehrman has pointed out this shit has been edited/altered either intentionally/accidentally or both and we do not possess original documents so all we can do is debate what the copies say and hope that the various generations of scribes who copied this stuff were honest or competent.

I know there are plenty of people over at Freethought and Rationalism who get themselves all worked up over a given word but if you have no confidence in the source what's the point?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Minimalist - December 7, 2011 at 7:48 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 5883 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 13561 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 2404 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 3580 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 73651 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 30265 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Historical Reliability of the New Testament Randy Carson 706 135079 June 9, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 8317 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Exclamation Jesus is Dead Cinjin 73 16932 February 12, 2015 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 7838 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)