(January 28, 2023 at 12:40 pm)GrandizerII Wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomb%27s_paradox
A lot of you would know about this already. The interesting thing about this puzzle is that even though it seems like there is a very clear correct answer here, there are a lot of people who insist that's not correct ... and I'm taking philosophers, mathematicians, game theorists, and not just laypeople. So I guess that's really where the "paradox" lies.
Anyway, here's the problem to consider:
You have two boxes in front of you. Behind these two boxes is the Predictor, some super-advanced being who is (at the very least)
at predicting beforehand what you would do.
Box A is transparent and contains $1000.
Box B is opaque and either contains $0 or $1000000
You have two options here:
Either choose both Box A and Box B, or
Choose Box B only
The Predictor has already predicted what option you would go for:
If they predicted you would choose both boxes, then Box B will contain $0.
If they predicted you would choose Box B only, then Box B will contain $1000000
Which option do you go for?
I suspect most of us here would choose Box B only, but it would be interesting to hear the different perspectives on this problem.
How good?
