(May 1, 2023 at 4:55 pm)WinterHold Wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect
Quote:The idea that small causes may have large effects in weather was earlier acknowledged by French mathematician and engineer Henri Poincaré. American mathematician and philosopher Norbert Wiener also contributed to this theory. Lorenz's work placed the concept of instability of the Earth's atmosphere onto a quantitative base and linked the concept of instability to the properties of large classes of dynamic systems which are undergoing nonlinear dynamics and deterministic chaos.[4]
Read my bold again and again. Science did say that the Butterfly Effect is a true valid probability.
So even if the planets' orbits had tiny microscopic changes, the change would reach you. Or:
First, even if the butterfly effect were real, that wouldn't mean that I could set up a camera up in front of a butterfly, and generate "butterfly-scopes" that would predict the weather. Chaotic systems exhibit large long-term deviations from small changes in initial conditions. But, by their very nature, you can't predict the result. You would need a computer more complicated than the system itself to model it.
Second, not all systems exhibit this instability, and even ones that are chaotic can have regions of stability. Take Saturn's rings for example. The orbit of any one particle in the rings is in general, chaotic (a many-body problem), but that chaos eventually leads to the particle finding a zone of semi-stability. This creates the gaps and patterns we see in the rings.
Third, it is true that every object you encounter in everyday life has more force, sound, light, and smell, and effect than a planet or a star.
Therefore, astrology is bunk.