Let's be honest

[Anomalocaris]

I am not sure yet more of the same dodges and same leading questions, the same apriori arguments, same affirmations of the consequence, the same affective fallacy, the same appeal to authority framed in the same duplicity, the same appeal to closure, etc, etc, offered in much the same condescending tone livens anything up at all.

Sure he does not quite shine as brightly as Drich as an example of how belief in god is compatible with no brains whatsoever, but Drich set the bar so low that no one else has the talent required to be able to fail to get over it.