(June 13, 2023 at 9:41 am)R-Farmer Wrote:(June 13, 2023 at 8:49 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: That's not a political argument, that's just you being a douche repeating some bullshit the reichwing nuts like to say. I think the better question is why you wouldn't? That's not something god has a problem with in magic book. In fact, it specifically tells people to go off raiding for minor sex slaves. It's not like there's anything wrong with that (or anything else) in gods unchanging ultimate moral relativism.
It seems you have veered off topic. The question I asked was based on your comment that you wanted/preferred flexible morality over god's ridged never changing righteousness.
My question is If society makes it legal for MAPs to have sex with children would you be ok with this? because like it or not know it or not this movement is gaining traction. I'm just asking do you have a line where you say no to the continuous evolution of morality?
Again no judgement or offense intended. Nor am I looking to challenge your answer. Just wanted to see how far this line of thought goes.
Nudger has stated that his positon is one of objective morality. How did you arrive at the notion that he would bow to the winds of moral fashion. If I were him I would be offended at the insuation as well. What on earth makes you think this is his 'line of thought' in the first place? Are you so convinced that he's a moral relativist that you litertally can't hear him when he tells you he's not?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
