(June 16, 2023 at 9:04 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(June 15, 2023 at 4:19 pm)R-Farmer Wrote: What I'm saying is test the story with in the frame work of the story and make a conclusion from an honest effort. Otherwise you are simply setting parameters, the story was never met to meet.
If the story was never intended to meet a reasonable standard of evidence for determining if its claims are actually true in reality, in what way am I mistaken for not believing the story is actually true in reality?
Again back to my analogy of turning lead into gold.
Your 'reasonable standard' in my story was when you took an already known defeated process of turning lead into gold, using those finding to assume all other claims are equally invalid.
Meaning your reasonable standard is NOT a reasonable standard. Your reasonable standard becomes a confirmation bias when you refuse to test the formula as prescribed, and substituted your own processes/known failed experiment.
If you made an honest effort you would test the formula as prescribed.
