RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
June 17, 2023 at 4:41 am
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2023 at 4:43 am by Deesse23.)
As expected you gave ample evidence that you have no clue what you are talking about, starting with natural "laws"* and the conflation of this scientific term with the legal term (intentionally or not, i dont care if you are insanely ignorant or just dishonest: You are wrong at any rate).
It ends with you claiming that:
which is an assertion for which you have no data, and for which you can not have any data. Prove me wrong by showing your probability calculations for universes with life vs those without with reference to the (variations of) natural constants.
And even IF you could demonstrate that our universe is rather improbable....have you heared of people winning the lottery? Still no "first cause" needed, much less a sentient one.
So, there is at least half a dozen fundamental hurdles you have to cross before you can arrive at "god exists!", starting with your own, staggering ignorance.
*i am leaving out your complete ignorance about the context of the usage of the word "code" for DNA.
It ends with you claiming that:
Quote:narrow range .... of life-permitting universes is vastly less probable than life-precluding ones
which is an assertion for which you have no data, and for which you can not have any data. Prove me wrong by showing your probability calculations for universes with life vs those without with reference to the (variations of) natural constants.
And even IF you could demonstrate that our universe is rather improbable....have you heared of people winning the lottery? Still no "first cause" needed, much less a sentient one.
So, there is at least half a dozen fundamental hurdles you have to cross before you can arrive at "god exists!", starting with your own, staggering ignorance.
*i am leaving out your complete ignorance about the context of the usage of the word "code" for DNA.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse