(June 17, 2023 at 3:07 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Restating the same apologetics over and over isn't a new thing here.
There are no awards for talking the most.
I agree restating the same old apologetics isn't new.. That's why I brought several different apologetics to the table.
We talked about sin being like a virus rather than point of morality, how all morality is relative, even objective morality. My position on the ark may not have originated here in this thread but it seemed new enough to thrown a few of you for a loop. because like the other two previous examples once all the low hanging fruit, like how did the eggs show up, or how where they incubated or did mrs Noah breast feed all the animals were in fact plausibly answered that subject was seemingly dropped rather quickly. In fact outside of these low hanging fruit questions the subject was either dropped or attacks on me or my cognitive abilities began.
So while I agree volume of content does not nor should not win any prizes, I am in fact bringing content that is at least different enough, that the typical stock answers you guys are use to providing do apply to what I have said here. Not only that I have demonstrated that I can plausibly defend these apologetics to the point that the counterpoint side of the conversation degrades into a ad hom attacks against me personally. (this is seemingly the hallmark of an atheist concession of a subject matter. IE can't attack/address the subject any more so try and kill the messenger.)
Which is seemingly where we are now, and what brings me to my final point. I understand I am on your home turf and as a gesture of good will I will allow you guys the last word once the topical relevant portion of the discussion has concluded. Now don't misunderstand. I'm not going to tuck tail and run just because you call me mean names during the discussion. What I am saying/offering is if and when you guys completely stop talking about the subject matter and only say obscene or nasty things about me personally I will not respond to those things. At this point feel free to claim your victory.
For example the two posts above this one were just 100% ad hom attacks. I will not be directly addressing those. If they wish either poster can claim they 'won.'
