(June 16, 2023 at 11:30 am)R-Farmer Wrote:(June 16, 2023 at 9:04 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: If the story was never intended to meet a reasonable standard of evidence for determining if its claims are actually true in reality, in what way am I mistaken for not believing the story is actually true in reality?
Again back to my analogy of turning lead into gold.
Your 'reasonable standard' in my story was when you took an already known defeated process of turning lead into gold, using those finding to assume all other claims are equally invalid.
Meaning your reasonable standard is NOT a reasonable standard. Your reasonable standard becomes a confirmation bias when you refuse to test the formula as prescribed, and substituted your own processes/known failed experiment.
If you made an honest effort you would test the formula as prescribed.
I'm getting really tired of you impugning my honesty. It's not my obligation to test your formula. It's your obligation to demonstrate it, an obligation you are clearly seeking to evade. You don't need to tell, or even be convincing, if you can show.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
