RE: Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God.
June 19, 2023 at 6:36 pm
(June 19, 2023 at 6:17 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(June 17, 2023 at 3:14 pm)Nishant Xavier Wrote: "...the quote circulating on social media has been taken out of context from a letter in which she was describing a perception she wanted to avoid."
LOL. Is that the best leftist "fact-checkers" can do? Yes, she was "describing a perception she wanted to avoid", the perception that she was a Racist Eugenicist. Her support for both racism and eugenics is well documented and well known, as that very article you cited notes. Read it in context and it's just the same: she does not want word to go out that she wants to exterminate the N/Black Population and she wants leftist/liberal "ministers" of hers to "straighten them out" if "ever that idea" occurs "to the more rebellious members" of Black People. So much for her enlightened, non-racist views. In blunt language, she wanted to (1) exterminate the Black population (2) didn't want word to go out that she did ("describing a perception she wanted to avoid") (3) wanted (false) "ministers" of hers to spread these fake/evil/sinful/immoral racial and eugenic theories, and (4) "straighten out" all those who might oppose her, whom she deemed (5) more rebellious members of Black People?
Heard of the saying, 'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' (who watches the watchmen). In our day, it would be who fact-checks the "fact-checkers".
The source notes that we can't know what was really going on in Sanger's brain. But you are uttterly certain you do; and mock the fact checkers who you just said were factually correct in this case.
On a side note, it doesn't take much to get you on a long-winded rant, does it? Where do you find the time?
Well, ya know, he is doing god's work and therefore gets all the time he needs. This is probably the poster I have skimmed the most and actually read the least.