RE: Absolutes and Atheism
June 19, 2023 at 11:26 pm
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2023 at 11:36 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(June 19, 2023 at 10:50 pm)Tomato Wrote: This is the part that stood out for me that I want to expand upon:
It's not a matter of sensing and knowing. For starters, sensing is not a valid approach toward perceiving reality. One can sense anything and believe it to be real merely with the notion of allowing the imagination to rule over reason. Further, knowing must carry with it the empiricism to back it up. Otherwise, the inward subjectivity of knowing is just a confusion due to an entanglement with sensing.
Glad you caught that. Good reading of my rant. Yes, the gap between sensing and knowing refers to the ability to connect sense data and felt experience to a valid conitive map, i.e. one that meaningfully connects the the personal existent with what is other that itself. My point is that for all its flaws, Christianity served that function until the modern period when the authority of Scripture is no longer respected. We lost not just a god-of-the gaps but god of THE gap... the bridge connecting all gaps. That is essentially what constitutes a Necessay Being. But we are starting with the premise that no being is necessary. So we are left with a problem because the connection between reality as experienced has no meaningful referent. A referent, the existence of which is accepted on faith..the existential choice to believe without evidence... that there is an intelligible order. Sure you can sense something, but how do you know if that something is significant?
<insert profound quote here>