(June 22, 2023 at 1:42 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(June 22, 2023 at 1:34 pm)R-Farmer Wrote: read the blue printed part of the article. It literally says at the depths in the earth that this ringwoodite (Rock containing water) is, there is enough force to squeeze the water out of the rock.. Kinda LIKE how An Artesian Well works/water squeezed out of the strata.
what is funny is you are arguing with cited and referenced material from a publicly recognized source with your own person understanding of the subject. No references no citations, nothing to refute what the cited material I quoted actually says. What's more you don't seem to understand you are not challenging anything I have personally produced. but rather published/peer review works from reputable geologists.
🤣
see, in reality, interrelationship between demonstrable facts and known properties of materials and forces matter, and quoting chapter and verse does not.
if you wasted your life reading the bible instead of learning about reality it is not my job to write you a text book in the implausible event you would suddenly see the light, so to speak, and want to catch up.
Suffice it to say look up the pressure and temperature at 700km depth. look up the strength of available rocks and minerals at 700 kms. see if porosity, much less an open hole to the surface, can exist.
Then look up the pressure and temperature again, look up the property it water, and see if water can continue to exist if pressure is relieved at that temperature.
Look up the temperature again. look at the strength of chemical bonds with stuff like amino acids, you know, the actual stuff you are made from, not the biblical clay, and see whether they can continue to exist at that temperature or anywhere near a flood of substances at that temperature.
It is funny that, having made this entire thread a long lamentable exhibition of your total ignorance of all that has been discovered since the bronze age yokels wrote your bible, you still brazenly double down on imaginative ludicrosity and yammer away instead of cutting your losses, and stop being yet a further ambarassemrnt to your bible sprouting ignoramus kind.
again.. You are arguing with cited scientific data from reputable sources.. Not my own exposition, AND foolishlywith nothing more than your say so to back up your claim.
(smart people know this is a foolish practice.)
Because EVEN IF you were a published geologist the only opportunity you would have in a formal discussion is to present supporting citations and evidence that directly refutes the data provided in the quoted material I presented.
You have yet to do this. rather you went back to your cave man tactic of intellectual bulling through a series of ad hom attempts to kill the credibility of the messenger without actually formally addressing the cited message in any legitimate way. You say I said so is not a legitimate argument.
