Christianity's Valuable Contributions to Humanity: An Examination of Militant Atheism

[Deesse23]

Deesse, fix the quote, it looks like I said that crap instead of Nishant.

But if we are to believe Nishant, the 19th-century Christians, like Lincoln, were fighting to free slaves from evil Marxists, which is why we should go back to medieval serfdom and outlaw woman's right to choose.

It has alreay been explained, but what the OP fundamentally does NOT understand is this:

If christians are against slavery it goes AGAINST biblical doctrine, which repeatedly and clearly tells them how to properly enslave others, even their own (jews) tribe! The bible clearly gave differnent rules in how to properly enslave jews and non-jews, males and females. Christians have to own their bible, period.
If communist or facsict atheists, or whoever, murder people, even in the name of atheism, it has nothing to do with atheism per se. Just because i claim that i do x in the name of y does not make my claim true. Atheism is not a belief, has no doctrine. No atheist has to own Josef Stalin when he murders people in the name of atheism, because atheism never informed Stalin about having to order people. Murder is not a requirement for atheism, not even a byproduct (as opposed to the bible and slavery).

All the rest is just a dishonest smokescreen, including this stupid indentured servitude BS, as if that was substantially LESS immoral than slavery. I never could understand why anyone would try to mount such a stupid defense. Arguments like this just demonstrate how morally and argumentatively bankrupt anyone is who is trying to use these apologetics.
OPs plan clearly is to bullshit this forum into submission.