your notion of “experience based” is indistinguishable from “faith based”, which is also indistinguishable from “bullshit based”, because none of it contain any demonstrable and repeatable method to control for, or exclude the impact of subjectivity or, blatant bullshit.
That fact that scientist are subject to subjectivity does not alter the fact that science is credible because it also contain practices and mechanisms for controlling for the effects of subjectivity and bullshit. your drawing of equivalence between science and bullshit, aka faith, exhibits your duplicitous personality because the fundamental distinguishing feature of science, which makes it credit where faith can never have credibility to the intellectually honest, is precisely demonstrable and repeatable method to control for, or exclude the impact of subjectivity.
That fact that scientist are subject to subjectivity does not alter the fact that science is credible because it also contain practices and mechanisms for controlling for the effects of subjectivity and bullshit. your drawing of equivalence between science and bullshit, aka faith, exhibits your duplicitous personality because the fundamental distinguishing feature of science, which makes it credit where faith can never have credibility to the intellectually honest, is precisely demonstrable and repeatable method to control for, or exclude the impact of subjectivity.
