(June 27, 2023 at 2:16 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: You've already crossed the "alien spaceship" rubicon. That's pretty much the end for your ark bit as far as I'm concerned.ok cool that was an easy way to end the discussion..
Note to self; save spaceship argument to end discussions approaching the ad nauseaium threshold in the future.
Quote:You must mean gods godness, again, as there is no such thing as right, in fact, for there to be any righteousness, according to you. Stop bickering with me.
but I don't mean God's goodness. you use and think of morality as being a cosmic force that I'm trying to relabel as God's righteousness. When again there is no intrinsic good ness to God's righteousness here. Things are or Are not righteous simply because God identifies them as such. We through our morality then come back behind God and assign a moral value.
Quote:Tell me that I've got you all wrong or got you all right, and then at least we can have an honest discussion about whatever it is you really believe. I think you believe in a purely transactional amoral worldview.My belief is bible based. So if the Bible speaks in an absolute that is my position. Where things get 'fluid' are where things are not so absolute. Like the ark the tower of babble or maybe creation. I've got several theories for them. which again I'm not saying they are intentionally wrong or mis leading. I'm just of the position that if I am wrong in my theory, it will not effect my beliefs.
