Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 18, 2024, 10:23 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God.
RE: Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God.
GN, and I would refer you back to Alexander Hamilton's statement, also the founder of the Bank of New York where I worked a couple of years earlier. Here's the statement: "Good and wise men, in all ages have supposed that the Deity, from the relations we stand in to Himself, and to each other, has constituted an eternal and immutable Law, which is indispensably obligatory upon all mankind, prior to any human institution whatsoever. This is what is called the Law of Nature. Being coeval with mankind and dictated by God Himself, it is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries and at all times. No human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original [Law].

You are confusing contingent authorities, like human beings, with the Necessary Being. God is also the cause of the Scientific Laws of Nature, and those are Objective, not Subjective. In the same way, the Moral Laws of the Author of Nature, are also Objective. You can disbelieve in Gravity all you like, but Gravity still exists. If you think you can jump of a building without consequences, the Laws of Nature mean that you objectively cannot, irrespective of your subjective opinions. That's what being Objective means. It is not identical but similar or analogous with Objective Moral Laws.

Deese, you misunderstand; if some attribute exists in God, it exists in its highest perfection, and in its ultimate source, from which all creatures derive their share of it. Saltiness is not a perfection. Goodness is. We know from our Conscience that Goodness exists and we strive to be Good. We should be, yet we are not the source of that goodness. In fact, no contingent being can be the source of Goodness. Only God, Who is non-contingent, is. Wisdom is another perfection. We all strive to be wise. There is also no contradiction between being wise and being good. [Thus, there is no contradiction in God being the Source of Both Goodness and Wisdom]. The wiser we are, the closer we are to God. Only God is perfectly Wise. All this follows from His Non-Potentiality, and also follows from His having caused the Universe. One does not need "saltiness" to cause the Universe. One does however need Wisdom to do so, and Goodness to give us a Conscience.

Regards, 
Xavier.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. - by Nishant Xavier - July 8, 2023 at 3:15 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 34 2729 July 17, 2024 at 7:34 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 3552 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 4627 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 6489 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 3982 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 15264 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1192 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Moral universalism and theism Interaktive 20 2279 May 6, 2022 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 21115 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Legal evidence of atheism Interaktive 16 3002 February 9, 2020 at 8:44 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 56 Guest(s)