Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 5, 2025, 11:49 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience.
#22
RE: Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience.
I already gave some reasons why the Servant/Messiah is not Israel; the Servant is sinless and righteous, like the Sacrificial Lamb had to be without blemish, whereas Isaiah clearly says Israel was a sinful nation right from the beginning of his Book. This one point alone refutes that opinion. Second, the passage in Isaiah 49 clearly distinguishes the Servant from Israel, saying that the Servant's purpose is not to gather in only Israel (thus showing the Servant and Israel are distinct also), but also to bring God's Salvation to all the Gentiles, i.e. to the farthest ends of the Earth, as Jesus Christ has done. There were false messiahs in Jesus Christ's time, but none of them knew this hidden fact, that the Messiah must suffer and die for our sins. None of them also gathered any of the Gentiles to God, as Jesus Christ, the True Messiah alone did. It should be noted that the Messiah is sometimes called David to indicate He is a Son of David. In the same way, He can be called Israel to signify that He is a Son of Israel. He is a Son of Israel who alone will gather in all the Gentiles who believe in God also, so that Salvation may reach all.

It remains to show various Rabbis and Jewish Scholars, even post-Christian ones, who have themselves acknowledged Isaiah 53 is about King Messiah. The Messiah must be a Suffering Servant, suffer, Sacrifice and die for the sins of His People before He returns in Glory as Conquering King. We know the 2nd will come to pass because the first came to pass. Here are some testimonies from Rabbis/Jewish Scholars on Isaiah 53:

One of them gets it so astonishingly write he is almost Christian, he said: whoever will not admit the Messiah suffers for our sins must suffer for his own sins.

Readers following this issue can peruse this link for more sources: https://jewsforjesus.org/learn/whos-the-...-isaiah-53

Quote:

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. - by Nishant Xavier - July 23, 2023 at 11:02 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 34 5056 July 17, 2024 at 7:34 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 5967 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 7571 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church. Nishant Xavier 36 4073 August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Christianity in Africa stats: <10 MN in 1900, 700 MN today. Nishant Xavier 75 9571 July 24, 2023 at 8:30 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 20578 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 6992 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1564 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Legal evidence of atheism Interaktive 16 3916 February 9, 2020 at 8:44 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Evidence for Believing Lek 368 72987 November 14, 2019 at 5:39 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)