Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2025, 5:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience.
#51
RE: Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience.
Another Video on Isaiah 53: Good to see Creative Christians making excellent use of digital media for the Cause of the Gospel. Isaiah 53 is irrefutable. It is sufficient to prove to Jews that Jesus Christ is the True Messiah and to Atheists that God is Omniscient, since it pre-dates Christ's Birth.

"The Prophecy of Isaiah 53 (New Animation)
https://youtu.be/cmMRoE-58P0

And, no, Bucky, the Divine Son of God, the Natural Son of God, is Divine and Pre-Existent. He alone has Power to save from the Fire, as we see in Daniel 2, which also pre-dates Christ's Birth and refutes other Pharisaic claims: "He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God."(Daniel 3:25)

A Divine, Pre-Existent and Powerful Son of God Who rushed down from His Father's Throne in Heaven to save Daniel's 3 friends from the fire: The Gospel of Christ hidden in a riddle in the OT by an all wise God. Only the Son of God has Power to save from Eternal Fire and that's what this story mystically conveys.

As St. John the Apostle explains, everyone who receives Jesus Christ as his Savior becomes a son of God, an adopted son. That's not the same as Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Natural Son. So the other objection fails also. The Son of God is real, He is no metaphor, He came down from Heaven, He is the most influential man in history, and 2.6 BN people worship Him while a further 2 BN Muslims believe He is the Messiah, though they wrongly think, influenced by Judaism, that He is only the Prophet - because they don't understand, like the Jews, who the Messiah was supposed to be: The Son of God and Savior of the world, who dies and offers Himself in Sacrifice to save us from our sins. When we say this year is 2023, what do we mean? 2023 years since the coming of Jesus Christ, that's how influential Jesus Christ has been, and He is the Son of God.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. - by Nishant Xavier - July 25, 2023 at 1:18 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 34 5036 July 17, 2024 at 7:34 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 5921 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 7545 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church. Nishant Xavier 36 4064 August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Christianity in Africa stats: <10 MN in 1900, 700 MN today. Nishant Xavier 75 9522 July 24, 2023 at 8:30 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 20522 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 6968 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1561 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Legal evidence of atheism Interaktive 16 3909 February 9, 2020 at 8:44 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Evidence for Believing Lek 368 72870 November 14, 2019 at 5:39 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)