Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience.

[Bucky Ball]

Another Video on Isaiah 53: Good to see Creative Christians making excellent use of digital media for the Cause of the Gospel. Isaiah 53 is irrefutable. It is sufficient to prove to Jews that Jesus Christ is the True Messiah and to Atheists that God is Omniscient, since it pre-dates Christ's Birth.

"The Prophecy of Isaiah 53 (New Animation)
https://youtu.be/cmMRoE-58P0

And, no, Bucky, the Divine Son of God, the Natural Son of God, is Divine and Pre-Existent. He alone has Power to save from the Fire, as we see in Daniel 2, which also pre-dates Christ's Birth and refutes other Pharisaic claims: "He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God."(Daniel 3:25)

A Divine, Pre-Existent and Powerful Son of God Who rushed down from His Father's Throne in Heaven to save Daniel's 3 friends from the fire: The Gospel of Christ hidden in a riddle in the OT by an all wise God. Only the Son of God has Power to save from Eternal Fire and that's what this story mystically conveys.

bla bla bla

Thanks for your irrelevant nonsense. We're talking about JEWISH culture, NOT what Christians over the centuries CHANGED it to mean.
Presentism : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism..._analysis)

Totally false. All total bullshit by this ignorant fundamentalist.
I already told you, we know the use of prophecy as omen reading, which is what you're doing, was forbidden. 
More total drivel from the faker, with no education. As you were told yesterday, no Jew, INCLUDING all the prophets, has ANY notion of a divine son of god. Not pre-existent or otherwise. A Jew who said that there was an equivalent being who was his son, would get stoned to death, which they attempted to do with Jesus. "Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him" John 10:31

No Jew would EVER posit that there was a being equivalent to Yahweh. So stick your "divine son" up your ass, and go get an education. What an ignorant fool. But please, keep embarrassing yourself on a daily basis, and thanks for providing such easy targets to knock down. 

You post all mere nothing-burgers, mere assertions with no evidence. THE "son of god" has a form ? LOL
You do know also I hope that Daniel is known to be a fake, totally. It's a tale. 

Book of Daniel is a 2nd-century BC biblical apocalypse with a 6th century BC setting. Ostensibly "an account of the activities and visions of Daniel a noble Jew exiled in Babylon, it combines a prophecy of history with an eschatology (a portrayal of end times) both cosmic in scope and political in focus, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Da...9336-1]and its message is that just as the God of Israel saves Daniel from his enemies, so he would save all Israel in their present oppression https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Da...r2005218-3][/url]

Do you people actually read the rubbish you post.  

Once again, just as yesterday, your total ignorance of Jewish culture is here for all to see. 
https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/artic...son-of-god

Son of God : 
"Term applied to an angel or demigod, one of the mythological beings whose exploits are described in Gen. vi. 2-4, and whose ill conduct was among the causes of the Flood; to a judge or ruler "children of the Most High"; in many passages "gods" and "judges" seem to be equations; comp. Ex. xxi. 6 [R. V., margin] and xxii. 8, 9); and to the real or ideal king over Israel (II Sam. vii. 14, with reference to David and his dynasty; comp. Ps. lxxxix. 27, 28). "Sons of God" and "children of God" are applied also to Israel as a people (comp. Ex. iv. 22 and Hos. xi. 1) and to all members of the human race.

"Yet the term by no means carries the idea of physical descent from, and essential unity with, God the Father. The Hebrew idiom conveys nothing further than a simple expression of godlikeness. In fact, the term "son of God" is rarely used in Jewish literature in the sense of "Messiah". Though in Sukkah.52a the words of Ps. ii. 7, 8 are put into the mouth of Messiah, son of David, he himself is not called "son of God." The more familiar epithet is "King Messiah," based partly on this psalm (Gen. R. xliv.). In the Targum the of Ps. lxxx. 16 is rendered "King Messiah", while Ps. ii. 7 is paraphrased in a manner that removes the anthropomorphism of the Hebrew: "Thou art beloved unto me, like a son unto a father, pure as on the day when I created thee."

THAT'S what the Hebrew prophets thought about your the subject, and THAT is how Hebrew prophets understood "son of god". You cannot come along centuries LATER and attempt to make it say something it never did. 

You do know I hope that Christians did not always believe Jesus was divine, and they ARGUED about it in at least two councils, and they were busy in their "kitchen" cooking up Christianity.
In 325, the first ecumenical council (First Council of Nicaea) determined that Jesus Christ was God, "consubstantial" with the Father, and rejected the Arian contention that Jesus was a created being. This was reaffirmed at the First Council of Constantinople (381) and the Council of Ephesus (431).

I hope you also know that in the "Heavenly Court" there were many many "divine beings". Being *divine* in Hebrew thought did not make you a god.  
Please post something equally stupid tomorrow, and we'll continue your education.

Deuteronomy 18:10-14
10 Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft,
11 or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.
12 Anyone who does these things is detestable to the LORD; because of these same detestable practices the LORD your God will drive out those nations before you.
13 You must be blameless before the LORD your God.
14 The nations you will dispossess listen to those who practice sorcery or divination. But as for you, the LORD your God has not permitted you to do so.

ta ta