RE: The Principle of Contingent Causation: The Impossibility of Infinite Regress.
July 25, 2023 at 6:28 pm
(July 25, 2023 at 6:26 pm)Angrboda Wrote:Of course, he won't concede. Because that would mean you the wicked unbeliever defeated him and his idealogy renders that impossible.(July 25, 2023 at 6:19 pm)Nishant Xavier Wrote: Nope, we are starting with a series of past moments going back in time. You know, like yesterday, the day before, and so on. Keep counting that on paper, and when you get to -infinity, let me know, and I'll immediately concede the argument. lolol. Gotta love Atheists.
Since that has nothing to do with the universe and past infinities, all you've shown is that you're a bit of a moron.
You won't concede no matter what you are presented with. But back atcha, prove that my possibility for a universe which began, is past finite, and is the first cause is not possible. If you can't do that, then the rest of this nonsense doesn't matter as I don't need a past infinite universe or an actual infinity to show that you are wrong, as I have already demonstrated. You lack both the skills needed to digest the points given, the honesty to admit when you are licked. You are simply another stupid person who has convinced himself that he is not stupid in the relevant areas. Such persons are a dime a dozen, and their and your pronouncements are worth nothing.
Gotta love Theists
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM