(July 26, 2023 at 1:41 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
here's a free one that's better than reddit.
I'm not arguing that they are the authority on anything. I argue that their self-identity classifies them as Christian, and as such, within their field they have contributed to society. I don't think you can separate the who they claim from the who they are. Not that it matters. In some way part of who they are is/was Christian. Their Christianity may have zero bearing on their scientific contribution, but it can't be divorced from who they are. Therefore it meets the definition of Christian contribution.
(July 28, 2023 at 12:18 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:I don't deny, that Religious view and christians themselves have been a negative influence in healthcare and may other areas GN. That wasn't the assignment though. Even stumbling around into doing the right things for the wrong reasons still shows that there was a "right thing" and Christians did it, by your own admission.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari