(August 20, 2023 at 9:17 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It's not a series of non seqs...or any fallacy, at all. That's why it's deemed successful. It might be wrong for any number of reasons, but logical validity isn't one of them.
Plantigna:
"Let P be the ensemble of the properties of omniscience, omnipotence, and perfect moral goodness, and define the property of being maximally P as that property possessed by something if and only if it exists, and has P, in every possible world. If it is then granted that the property of being maximally P is possibly exemplified, it follows that it is exemplified."
Teresita:
"Let Q be the ensemble of the properties of omniscience, omnipotence, and unadulterated moral evil. Substitute Q for P in your argument. If it is granted that the property of being maximally Q is possibly exemplified, it follows that it is exemplified."
