(September 2, 2023 at 12:42 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:Actually, it is undermined by sheer fact as I already pointed out that it's supposedly not a fossil fuel plane using a regular high-end private jet that does use fossil fuel would have the same impact. Choosing a non-existent plane that's never going to happen as opposed to a real plane that they actually use and is often a wasteful status symbol gets the same message without any of the pitfalls I just listed.(September 2, 2023 at 4:14 am)The Architect Of Fate Wrote: I would have preferred simplicity and something that didn't undermine it own point
The point is not undermined. Rather it is reinforced.
A regular plane has many uses whose economic, social or environmental value outweigh its environmental impacts. The point of Showing a regular plane is thus somewhat ambiguous.
The point here is in this case, regular planes are being used in an exhibitionist manner to showboat the passenger’s make belief concern for environment, in a manner that certainly does not have any economic or environmental value to outweigh its true environmental impact.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM