(September 7, 2023 at 4:37 pm)FrustratedFool Wrote: Fair enough. So the ideals for man and woman are different.Your assumption and mindset are that there is an either or dynamic going on, which is incorrect. You can be a male with 100% nurturer as a trait and that has zero bearing on me identifying them as a “real man”. As I stated nurturer was not part of my definition of “real man”. you can be both a nurturer and a protector but they are not the same thing.
Men are primarily protectors, women primarily nuturers, in your view.
So a man who was far more a nuturer than a protector wouldnt be a real man, yes?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
