(December 12, 2023 at 3:46 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(December 12, 2023 at 11:38 am)Ahriman Wrote: Why would it even need to get to that point? That's like saying, "well, my kitchen is on fire, but I won't do anything about it until the whole house is on fire". And in this context, "having smaller families" just means, having families without children.
Strange, considering that when I wrote about it yesterday, when I mentioned "Smaller families," it wasn't just "no children." You could still have children with smaller families. There'd just be fewer kids (I didn't have a cutoff threshold in mind, but thinking about that, I guess three would have been a good maximum for what constitutes a "smaller family.")
And you're willing to enfore that quota, if need be?
"Imagination, life is your creation"
