Who you voting for?

[kılıç_mehmet]

Yes, for the most part our country is ruled by the rich, but at least we poor have a chance of making it to public office. Your system is tyranical and the doors are shut to everyone BUT the rich..which is a big difference.

Nope. They are open to the learned people. Why would a poor uneducated person be allowed to run anything?
IF anything, they would be given a job, education and etc. if he/she wants to study, of course. Some do, some don't.
Not everyone is destined to rule something, not everyone can overcome the huge burden, whereas most rulers are just there for personal profit, not in order to provide good governance. The fact that there is a "chance" or better say, an illusion to making it to a public office does not mean that they will. Here too, even the poorest peasant has that chance. But without money, you cannot get elected.
In my system, if you are believed to be a useful person, you will be recruited into the system.
Your personal wealth will have no influence on your position within the government.

How the FUCK can anyone be rich in that scenero?

You want to abolish *money* but you cannot abolish the monetary system.
People will always have need to barter, pay or wrangle eachother for something they need.

And finally, no anarchist would ever accept a "rulership" or authority over other people, nor would they want to create a government, much less a side government.

That is why they are lazy, and never up to the responsibility.

Its not my fault that you are ignorant to basic definitions such as "anarchy". Do your homework or deserve your scoffing.

Really, reading 10+ definitions from any dictionaries in any language out there won't change my mind about an unrealistic and impossible system without a system.

A little bit of racism seeping out again is it not?

You yourself told me that you will be the enemy of that government.
Why would you really live under it anyways? Besides, it's a state based on worldwide ethnolinguistical collaboration, so yes, citizenship will mainly be admitted to those who this state is for, and the minorities that live under our rule.

Everyone deserves food, water, shelter, equality and good health regardles of wether you think they deserve it or not.

I agree with you. And in this system, they will get it. However, those who try to leech off of the system, may they be rich(and the rich do it even more than the poor), or poor, will receive what they deserve.
Honest people, who try to live a dignified life will receive what they deserve.

If you oppose this then you are rightly an enemy of the people and a possible tyrant in my eyes. You call it selfish mob rule. I call it welfare of the people.

I care for the welbeing of my people. This is the first, utmost priority of our way of thinking. We believe in an idealist way of life. And we extend this to our ways of conducting business, and government-people relations.
Public welfare will be a cornerstone of this system, with even the most malicious having access to it, but they will be restricted to having any kind of power within the system, like for example, some fucktard from a slum rising up to become a minister, just because he is a far relative of the president, or one of his ministers, will not be possible in this system, just like a rich guy blackmailing/bribing governmental officials to obtain political power will not happen in this country.

Anarchist, on the other hand, prefer direct democracy without a centralized government. In fact, centralized power is one of the biggest things they fight against.

Which is the reason why they fail. Without a centralized government, there would be no country, and no need to have a "democracy", except for in very primitive cases, in wich they'll probably vote on whether to paint their wartruck red(fasta) or yellow(shooty).

Wow...the farthest I would go is smashing your banks the fuck up. You, on the other hand, feel fine about breaking bones. Becareful. Once you cross that line, you may find yourself in a situation where you become the gimp.

I don't really care. I've been beaten up and have fought others due to my ideals. If someone wants to break my legs, let them come. I'm not afraid.
Besides, I have people in whom I find security and friendship in. That guy has no one, no one besides the people who clap behind him and his every misdeed, and we know who those cowards are. Those who mock the people with such words will all get what they deserve.

Dictatorships are not possible in an anarchist system. No government, no state, no money, property is commonly owned, and most people are well armed to protect their freedoms.

Well, your system would work under the circumstances of a system like the Venus project, which is, imo, a quite intrguing system that we could adopt for our own people, like automatisation, computers and etc..
However, until the day where full automatisation and world hunger problems are solved, I'm not sure that anarchy is applicable in any way.
I think that a place without laws does not stand a chance for survival, even if you make property common, it needs to be in such an abundance as for the people to regard it as worthless, like air, for example.

As far as dictating policies, everyone is capable of doing such a thing.

I'm sure that everyone is able to sign pieces of papers.
But that's not what I'm talking about.

Not with zero-state morality. From the perspective of I, everything changed with vector atheism. The problem is that vector atheism is religion, which inevitably evolves into religious nonsense. The solution seems to be viral anti-meme. On it

Indeed, that will be the main point of my system. It will be founded on ideals, not on public demand, and shape the public to fit that ideal, in which our people will live a life of relative peace and prosperity.
This won't be done by force, no. It will be done by education and the provision of quality goods and services to the people.