RE: Proposed Award - Kook of the Month
December 23, 2011 at 10:23 am
(December 23, 2011 at 9:36 am)Napoleon Wrote: Riiiighhht. And your point? I don't think calling someone a kook is nearly as offensive as calling someone a child molester.
You can easily call someone a kook in jest, calling them a child molester is less funny due to the implications.
If the theist qualifies to have the "Kook" award, because he's stupid. It's no problem - hardly inappropriate nor bigoted title. I was saying to avoid the possible bigotry like calling Catholic a child molester.
(December 23, 2011 at 9:43 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: It may well be, but to put it in the same sentence and same context as an appropriate title - such as "deluded", is contradictory and renders your point meaningless.
You're right.
The appropriateness depends on the context of title that we are planning to make in future, no?