Again, why?

Fuck em.

(December 23, 2011 at 7:37 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Again, why?

Fuck em.

Well we could "fuck 'em" ....politely??

(December 23, 2011 at 7:37 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Again, why?

Fuck em.

Because I'm trying not to be cruel? But, yeah, I do have limitations of religion tolerance.

I wouldn't mind if we award with title: "Fuckwits" to the theists below.
If theists condones pedophilia, Fuck 'em
If theists condones slavery, Fuck 'em
If theists condones the beatings to train girls, Fuck 'em
If theists condones by indoctrinating the religion to children, Fuck 'em.
If theists condones the power of prayer over modern medicine, Fuck 'em.
If theists condemned homosexuality for their religious reasons, Fuck 'em.
If theists want ID and Creationism to be teach in the schools, Fuck 'em.
Lol. I'm contradicting myself, am I not? Still doesn't hurt to be polite anyway.

So let's back to the topic of awards. Why not add contents to award like, the information why they are rewarded with award titled 'you are stupid' or whatever more appropriate title.
-Theists' stupid comment and reference.
-Reasons why the thiests' comment is stupid.

(December 23, 2011 at 5:01 am)Blam! Wrote: Point taken. What are we going to call them - "Fuckwit" or "Retard" or "Deluded" or "Child molester" - Which one is more appropriate title?

Calling someone a kook isn't the same as implying someone is a child rapist.

(December 23, 2011 at 9:14 am)Napoleon Wrote:

(December 23, 2011 at 5:01 am)Blam! Wrote: Point taken. What are we going to call them - "Fuckwit" or "Retard" or "Deluded" or "Child molester" - Which one is more appropriate title?

Calling someone a kook isn't the same as implying someone is a child rapist.

Correct. And "Child molester" is an example of inappropriate title.

(December 23, 2011 at 9:23 am)Blam! Wrote: Correct. And "Child molester" is an example of inappropriate title.

Riiiighhht. And your point? I don't think calling someone a kook is nearly as offensive as calling someone a child molester.

You can easily call someone a kook in jest, calling them a child molester is less funny due to the implications.

(December 23, 2011 at 9:23 am)Blam! Wrote:

(December 23, 2011 at 9:14 am)Napoleon Wrote:

(December 23, 2011 at 5:01 am)Blam! Wrote: Point taken. What are we going to call them - "Fuckwit" or "Retard" or "Deluded" or "Child molester" - Which one is more appropriate title?

Calling someone a kook isn't the same as implying someone is a child rapist.

Correct. And "Child molester" is an example of inappropriate title.

It may well be, but to put it in the same sentence and same context as an appropriate title - such as "deluded", is contradictory and renders your point meaningless.

(December 23, 2011 at 9:36 am)Napoleon Wrote: Riiiighhht. And your point? I don't think calling someone a kook is nearly as offensive as calling someone a child molester.
You can easily call someone a kook in jest, calling them a child molester is less funny due to the implications.

If the theist qualifies to have the "Kook" award, because he's stupid. It's no problem - hardly inappropriate nor bigoted title. I was saying to avoid the possible bigotry like calling Catholic a child molester.

(December 23, 2011 at 9:43 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: It may well be, but to put it in the same sentence and same context as an appropriate title - such as "deluded", is contradictory and renders your point meaningless.

You're right. The appropriateness depends on the context of title that we are planning to make in future, no?

Quote:Norfolk And Chance Wrote:
An intelligent theist is a contradiction. You need to have a level of gullibility below that of a 9 year old to believe in fairies. Intelligent theists do not exist

.


You're just taking the piss 'aving a laugh, in't it? You're not REALLY an ignorant bigot, are you?.

(December 21, 2011 at 5:39 pm)padraic Wrote: Seriously: What an obnoxious idea. Should such a thing ever be implemented I will leave immediately.In case you lack the sensitivity or wit to grasp it,your idea is a form of bullying. I loathe bullies.

I do not approve of a form of negative award. Members spend far too much time as it is shitting on persistent annoyances to occasional, well meaning dolts.