(May 18, 2024 at 7:13 am)h311inac311 Wrote:(May 17, 2024 at 4:59 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: It never had to. It's upon those making the claim that witches exist to prove their claim. This is called the burden of proof, and you're attempting to shift it elsewhere. Bad form.
Well Ravenshire Foxaer said, "where history SHOWS they were just ordinary women." If witches have been SHOWN to be ordinary women by history then I would expect Foxaer to have at least one example.
You're still asking for support of a claim in opposition to a claim you have no interest in supporting, only asserting. Whether anyone can show that many women were falsely accused of witchcraft over throughout history has no bearing whatsoever on whether you can support your claim that there are witches.
Honestly, It's not my claim, and not my fight, but if you're truly interested in the history of alleged witchcraft claims, there are tons of examples readily available. Google is you're friend, but only if you can pull yourself out of the circle jerk of willful ignorance.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
