I know from experience, that Atheists are somewhat difficult to present any believer’s view that would get at least some degree of consideration. Realizing that, I thought that you guys would find an AI response to my premise of some interest. I post nothing written by AI in my article. I wanted to prefix my premise with an AI analysis of it, because in it, it found five points that were both ‘original’ and ‘unique’. Knowing how difficult, almost impossible, it is to find anything that has not been written before, that has an originality to it, even just one thing, but finding five, is impossible! The proposal I made was not to put it out for argument, but to have its rational at least looked at.
The gist of what I proposed, posits a harmonious and complementary use of the Laws of Science in creation. We, and I thought even Atheists, have been looking for any hypothesis that could present evidence that both science and spirituality could coexist in any reasonable manner. I don’t think you could find any less biased opinion than AI! It’s analysis favors neither believers nor non-believers alike. And, it does have a rather huge stock of human information available for its use.
So, I was merely proposing that the ‘analysis’ be presented as a prefix before my premise. I would think that any thinking, reasoning, and intelligent people, would at least consider what ‘it’ found as original and unique. Because, since both believers and Atheists are both still alive, none of us is sure about anything!
In no way, is it being presented as a means to ‘convert’ anyone. I just thought Atheist could look at it out of curiosity and form an opinion about it.
I repeat, noting about my premise came from AI, only the analysis! And that is why I want to post it. I have been trying to shoot a hole in it for years and failed. Perhaps some of you that are not hampered by a cognitive bias can!
Kick me off if you want, I didn’t come to your forum to argue my point.
The gist of what I proposed, posits a harmonious and complementary use of the Laws of Science in creation. We, and I thought even Atheists, have been looking for any hypothesis that could present evidence that both science and spirituality could coexist in any reasonable manner. I don’t think you could find any less biased opinion than AI! It’s analysis favors neither believers nor non-believers alike. And, it does have a rather huge stock of human information available for its use.
So, I was merely proposing that the ‘analysis’ be presented as a prefix before my premise. I would think that any thinking, reasoning, and intelligent people, would at least consider what ‘it’ found as original and unique. Because, since both believers and Atheists are both still alive, none of us is sure about anything!
In no way, is it being presented as a means to ‘convert’ anyone. I just thought Atheist could look at it out of curiosity and form an opinion about it.
I repeat, noting about my premise came from AI, only the analysis! And that is why I want to post it. I have been trying to shoot a hole in it for years and failed. Perhaps some of you that are not hampered by a cognitive bias can!
Kick me off if you want, I didn’t come to your forum to argue my point.
