(November 21, 2024 at 12:56 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(November 20, 2024 at 7:48 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote: Or he gave an honest answer and people don't like that.
I don't. I think it's bullshit. You're a numbers guy, so tell us -- how many trans have molested girls in fem bathrooms? Be specific.
This is performative BS. Like he's not concerned about social security or foreign policy, but goddamn, them trans are invading the bathrooms. If you're more worried about trans bathroom rights than, say, China's threat to international commerce, I'd say that you're beguiled.
Don't need to; that question fundamentally misses the point. Allowing men - transexual or not - into women's bathrooms poses an inherent risk to women.
I'm sorry that's reality, I really am - I wish men wouldn't abuse the realities of sexual dimorphism and use it to overpower women for no reason other than they can.
But evil men do.
------
It's funny you mention Social Security; when I was mentioning bills Johnson has recently sponsored and voted on, one was HR 82 - Social Security Fairness Act, a bill which was introduced in 2023 which will ensure that widows, spouses, widowers, and those who receive other state or federal funding will not have their benefits docked and cut for it.
In September he voted for HR 3334 - the "Stop the Chinese Communist Party Act," a bill that requires the President to impose visa and property-blocking sanctions on any member of the CCP that plays a role in harassing the people Hong Kong, Tibet, and the Uyhger people. This was a bill that 210 GOP members voted in favor of and 172 Democrats voted against.
I'm really not sure I am that beguiled, as I said before; look at their voting records, that's truly the only power they hold.
