(Yesterday at 6:39 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote: First Stage - Non Sequitur
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement A: "Allowing men - transexual or not - into women's bathrooms poses an inherent risk to women."
Response: "You allege that any sort of man, trans or no, is dangerous."
You don't seem to understand that "risk" involves danger, and that imputing one implies the other. If men of any sort are an "inherent risk" to women in a restroom, it follows that men in a restroom of women are dangerous.
This is not a non sequitur. This is a logical extension of your claim.
I understand you want to dance on the balance beam, but you really can't have it both ways. You think that allowing men into a women's room, including trans women, is dangerous to women. Now present your evidence that this is so.
