Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?

[chi pan]

No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling, works of carpentry, or self-written manuscripts.

the only artifact we have is the shroud of torrin which people argue is the actual shroud that Jeses was burried with. even if we had any works of carpentry how would we know they're his? and no he wasn't a writter but neither was Mohamed and we all know he existed. and no historical evidence? what's all the documents i've provided? they're not in the bible written by skeptics and believers alike so why should they be disregarded?

There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus.

ya sure except for . CORNELIUS TACITUS Annals XV, 44.

All documents about Jesus came well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus, or from fraudulent, mythical or allegorical writings.

all the works i listed were written within 50 to 100 years of his death. the only one considered to be a fraud is FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS and the others were written by well known historians who would not distort the truth and if they were unsure of his existance they would say the account is unverified.