What was the point of mentioning it at all if it wasn't to support your position?
I believe that Min's point was that pretty much no one knowledgeable doesn't acknowledge that there are serious doubts about the authenticity of the shroud. The evidence indicates that it's not genuine. He would have worded it differently.
I believe that Min's point was that pretty much no one knowledgeable doesn't acknowledge that there are serious doubts about the authenticity of the shroud. The evidence indicates that it's not genuine. He would have worded it differently.
