RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
January 1, 2012 at 6:22 pm
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2012 at 6:46 pm by Cyberman.)
(January 1, 2012 at 5:19 am)Barre Wrote:(December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(December 7, 2011 at 7:50 pm)aleialoura Wrote: Where's the historical part? The book of old myths that you're quoting?
That's the hysterical part.
Um Stimbo, it seems that you are smugly triumphal. Would you agree?
Would you be surprised if I said I don't? For the record I was simultaneously passing commentary, making a pun and taking the piss. It's called humour; look it up, it's quite popular. I am neither smug nor triumphal. I have no need to be either; I am simply sitting here laughing at theists and related apologists tying themselves in knots with all the mental gymnastics required to make a collection of myths and fairy tales appear legitimate and relevant to the real world. If that makes me seem smug, and you object to it, perhaps you shouldn't be so funny to me (or to paraphrase the immortal Thunderf00t: Why do people laugh at biblical literalists? Only biblical literalists don't know why).
It seems to me that you are an arrogant arsehole. Would you agree?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
