Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?

[chi pan]

Found? Are you fucking kidding me? First off, the fact that you would even mention such an obvious fraud tells me that you are just a jerk.

fraud? ok even the history and discovery channel talked about this. they said the blood stains are most consistant with that of a burrial cloth for someone who was Crucified in the same manner of Jesus. even wikipedia says this

The Shroud of Turin or Turin Shroud (Italian: Sindone di Torino, Sacra Sindone) is a linen cloth bearing the image of a man who appears to have suffered physical trauma in a manner consistent with crucifixion.

so in reality, i gave it no more credit than wikipedia does so what's wrong with what i did?

The reason there are no artifacts "of jesus" is that there was no "jesus."

ok i'm so sick of you saying this. i did research on this presented it and you don't even have the decency to prove me wrong, all you're doing is saying i'm wrong. the most you ever did was bring me to a biased site saying Nazareth never existed and i bring evidence from a non biased site saying otherwise (that it was a very small village) and you just ignore it. if your gonna say i'm wrong next time back it up. i back myself up. and also, you ask for the impossible. if you can even find woodwork that old how could you accredit it to any carpenter? what significant thing did Jesus own? i provided many historical accounts written at the time by credible historians. oh, and most modern historians believe he existed too.

Most critical historians agree that Jesus was a Galilean Jewish Rabbi who was regarded as a teacher and healer in Judaea,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

You used an idiotic source, not Google.

the source i copy pasted from that Google search. it's right at the top word for word the entire quote. look at it again and compare.

I'm surprised you haven't been banned yet.

why would i be banned? have i broken any rules?

DEIST PALADIN EDITED TO FIX QUOTE BOXES