The Absurd GOP

[Angrboda]

Where did I refuse to recognize that freedom of speech is limited?  I didn't.  So this is you simply repeating and doubling down on shit that has already been answered.

All freedoms are relative.  That a particular freedom is not absolute is no argument that there is no such freedom.  That's just playing word games.

If you don't refuse to recognize it then perhaps you should stop insisting on existence of "free speech". Repeating bullshit does not make it true.

In civilized countries speech is regulated and that's all that there is to it.

In the U.S., is a person free to say what you just said without a realistic fear of having their speech censored, punished, or restricted? Yes or no?