I agree perhaps, and I make no claim that I can prove my very first premise. I make no claim that I can prove "God" as I have defined it, or that my definition of "God" is even accurate. I don't understand why people are claiming that I must prove something. My point is not to prove anything.
"This is why most rational intellectuals who hold an atheist stance support that agnostic aspect as well - for they are humble enough to know that they cannot truly know."
- which is why I believe atheism is another religion. It requires faith.
"This is why most rational intellectuals who hold an atheist stance support that agnostic aspect as well - for they are humble enough to know that they cannot truly know."
- which is why I believe atheism is another religion. It requires faith.