(January 6, 2012 at 9:25 pm)chipan Wrote: ok i've watched your video KichigaiNeko and you didn't really explain it right. it does have nothing to do with the solstice
Go look at it again dear...you must have gone for a coffee
(January 6, 2012 at 9:25 pm)chipan Wrote: it has to do with comparing the Egyption gods with the Christian/Jewish God. and your right, there are some Egyption gods that are similar to the Christian/Jewish God, but what do you expect? they had hundreds of gods. do you think maybe one of them could have similar charictoristics to any god? i'm sure you could take any Egyption god and compare it to any other god from any other religion and see similarities. i've heard a better arguement that the Christian Jewish god is similar to the Hindu god brahma.
Brahma is a law giver...and of course you would rather that. Your bias is away from anything Egyptian...but that is not all you again must have gone for a coffee/ loo break as Horus is not the only "god" that matches your jeebus...story line for story line... The joke is on you.
(January 6, 2012 at 9:25 pm)chipan Wrote: why is carbon dating inaccurate? it is based off the carbon 14 to carbon 12 ratio in all organic material. new carbon 14 is created in the atmosphere due to radiation from the sun enriching the carbon atoms. organisms absorb carbon from the atmosphere through the carbon cycle. so until the organism dies, it will have the same carbon 14 to carbon 12 ratio as in the atmosphere and when it dies it will stop getting new carbon and the carbon 14 will decay more and more until it's gone and they calculate the carbon 14 will completely deplete in 50,000 to 60,000 years (this is according to scientists and is a fact). it seams like a good dating method except how do you get your starting ratio? well scientists base the current atmospheric ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in the atmosphere for their starting ratio. what's wrong with this? it's ASSUMING that the carbon 14 ratio to the carbon 12 ratio is constant in the atmosphere no matter what time period it is (or at least that it has been for the past 50,000 years). this is not true. as i said more carbon 14 is created from the sun's radiation and we are exposed to it more and more (some think it's because of a weakening ozone layer) and because of this it gets more and more inaccurate the older it is because they did not have the same carbon 14 to carbon 12 ratio in the atmosphere as they do now.
As far as I know inaccuracy in carbon dating is a xtian dream. You have to make a great many ASSUMPTIONS to make YOUR version fit your dream.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5