Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?

[chi pan]

well Fpvpilot, you have gone above and beyond what i would have expected from anyone. good research even though athiests won't give you any credit i'm sure it took a while for you to gather all that information.
the fact is we can go round and round about this bringing forth hundreds of documents supporting the existance of Jesus and you coming back and saying "they're all fake" and so on or you can acknowledge that we have done more research than you have and know more about the subject than you have. you have not brought forth a single document saying Jesus did not exist that was written during the time period of Jesus. people didn't even ask that question until 100 years ago or so because they knew he existed. this is an arguement of ignorance in which case we have all the evidence and you have nothing. if you wish to ignore the evidence and believe what you want without actually looking for the truth, fine. but don't criticize us for believing the well known fact that JESUS HISTORICALLY EXISTED. the only evidence brought forth by athiests that he did not exist was from jesusdoesnotexist.com. if that's all you got then you have nothing. despite that fact, we looked at it, pointed out it was wrong, and provided backup for our claims. that's how you debate, and if you are just going to say "no" with no reason or even try to consider the fact then you're just wasting our time. we've put a lot of research into this and for you to just say "no" to every single bit of evidence we have is extremely closed minded. if you aren't willing to consider a second point of view you should just say so so we can stop wasting our time because this is just ridiculous.
anyone who is not willing to consider a second point of view despite any evidence thrown at them speak now so we can stop this circle of us doing all this work and you just saying "no" and "it's fake" without even taking a second look.